Trade Off Studies & System Evaluations
Comparing alternatives to deliver the right solution.
Most expensive engineering mistakes are not calculation errors; they are the wrong alternative chosen early and defended late. ICPE runs formal trade off studies that put the real options side by side: routes, voltages, equipment classes, rebuild versus replace, fatal flaw analysis, and the phasing choices that decide what a project costs over its life.
System evaluations do the same work for what you already own. ICPE assesses existing electrical and mechanical systems against today's loads, today's codes, and tomorrow's plans, and report what the system can actually carry rather than what the original drawings hoped.
Every study states its basis. Assumptions, weightings, and exclusions are written down, so the comparison holds up when someone questions it a year later, and the losing options are documented well enough that nobody has to re-study them.
The output is built for a decision meeting: alternatives priced at a consistent level, risks stated plainly, and a recommendation the engineers who wrote it are willing to defend in the room.
- Alternative studies: routing, voltage class, equipment, and phasing
- Rebuild versus replace evaluations for aging systems
- Capacity assessments against present and forecast loads
- Reliability and single-point-of-failure reviews
- Life-cycle cost comparisons with stated assumptions
- Condition evaluations feeding capital planning
- Option studies with weighted, documented comparisons
- System evaluation reports with code and calculation basis
- Planning-level costs per alternative
- A defensible recommendation, ready for the decision meeting
Need trade off studies & system evaluations? Let's talk specifics.
Send the scope, the site, and the schedule. A principal engineer will say straight out whether ICPE is the right firm for it.